6.12The main reason for categorisation is to allow for different processes and standards to apply to different countries. The alternative would be to treat extradition requests from all countries in the same manner. New Zealand could do this in one of two ways, but we find neither to be suitable. First, it could follow the Australian approach, which, by default, requires no court investigation into the evidence of the case against the person sought. Alternatively, it could maximise protection for the individual by providing a relatively formal, full process for all extradition requests, no matter where they come from.
6.13Instead, we propose that categorisation of countries is retained in the new Extradition Act and that the Act should provide for how those categories should be treated differently. In the following chapters, we discuss the aspects of the extradition process that may differ on the basis of a country’s categorisation. These relate to:
6.14Categorisation of the country could also influence: